zNetLaB › Guided labs › Enterprise
Triangle 50 — OSPF repair
Enterprise Intermediate 6 devices 7 checked tasks 70 points Plan lab
Scenario — Jabalpur, Jaipur and Guwahati are cabled in a triangle, so every office has two ways to every other. Everything was configured last week and the network worked. Today the end offices cannot reach each other: one router has been configured in the wrong area, so it never becomes a neighbour. Find it, fix it and prove the end-to-end paths again. You build it in a browser, type real commands at each device, and every task below is
checked against the running configuration — so you find out it is wrong before anybody else does.
Open this lab in the simulator
The simulator runs in your browser with nothing to install. This lab is part of the full simulator: open it free for 7 days with a new account, then with a plan. It needs an account, which keeps your progress.
The scenario
Jabalpur, Jaipur and Guwahati are cabled in a triangle, so every office has two ways to every other. Everything was configured last week and the network worked. Today the end offices cannot reach each other: one router has been configured in the wrong area, so it never becomes a neighbour. Find it, fix it and prove the end-to-end paths again.
Your role: a network engineer on the enterprise team. Level: Intermediate Done when: all 7 goals show as passed (70 points).
Network status
Devices: 3 routers, 3 PCs, cabled as drawn. No Layer 1 or Layer 2 faults: every link is connected and up. R-Jabalpur starts with addresses (G0/0 10.69.1.1/24, G0/1 172.17.49.1/30, G0/2 172.17.49.10/30) and OSPF 58 already configured. PC-Jabalpur is a host with 10.69.1.10/24, gateway 10.69.1.1. R-Jaipur starts with addresses (G0/0 10.69.2.1/24, G0/1 172.17.49.2/30, G0/2 172.17.49.5/30) and OSPF 58 already configured. PC-Jaipur is a host with 10.69.2.10/24, gateway 10.69.2.1. R-Guwahati starts with addresses (G0/0 10.69.3.1/24, G0/1 172.17.49.6/30, G0/2 172.17.49.9/30) and OSPF 58 already configured. PC-Guwahati is a host with 10.69.3.10/24, gateway 10.69.3.1.
Known problems
R-Guwahati has fewer OSPF neighbours than it has cables to routers, so routes are missing beyond it. No cable or interface is faulty: the fault is one line of configuration on one router. Everything else is correct and must be left alone.
Goals
R-Jabalpur has 2 OSPF neighbours in FULL (8 pts) R-Jaipur has 2 OSPF neighbours in FULL (8 pts) R-Guwahati has 2 OSPF neighbours in FULL (8 pts) R-Jabalpur learns 10.69.3.0/24 from the protocol (10 pts) 10.69.1.10 (Jabalpur) reaches 10.69.3.10 (Guwahati) (12 pts) 10.69.2.10 (Jaipur) reaches 10.69.1.10 (Jabalpur) (12 pts) Every LAN reaches every other LAN (12 pts)
The activity, in order
Confirm the symptom: ping the far PC from the near PC and note where it fails. On R-Jabalpur, enable OSPF on the right interfaces so it forms 2 neighbour(s) in state FULL. Neighbours must agree on area, subnet, hello/dead timers and authentication.Why: OSPF routes only flow over a FULL adjacency. If a neighbour is stuck in INIT or EXSTART, compare the two ends’ settings. Verify with: show ip ospf neighbor Follow the path hop by hop. On each router read its neighbours and its routes, starting with the one nearest the failure. On R-Jaipur, enable OSPF on the right interfaces so it forms 2 neighbour(s) in state FULL. Neighbours must agree on area, subnet, hello/dead timers and authentication.Why: OSPF routes only flow over a FULL adjacency. If a neighbour is stuck in INIT or EXSTART, compare the two ends’ settings. Verify with: show ip ospf neighbor Compare the suspect router with its neighbour: the same protocol, the same numbers, every link covered. On R-Guwahati, enable OSPF on the right interfaces so it forms 2 neighbour(s) in state FULL. Neighbours must agree on area, subnet, hello/dead timers and authentication.Why: OSPF routes only flow over a FULL adjacency. If a neighbour is stuck in INIT or EXSTART, compare the two ends’ settings. Verify with: show ip ospf neighbor Fix the single wrong line and nothing else. R-Jabalpur must have a route to 10.69.3.0/24 in its routing table. Check how it should learn it: a static route, or a routing protocol.Why: If the prefix is not in the routing table, the router drops packets for it, whatever else is configured. Verify with: show ip route Retest: neighbours, routes, then pings in both directions. From PC-Jabalpur, ping 10.69.3.10. If it fails, walk the path hop by hop: gateway, then each router’s routing table, then the way back.Why: A ping needs a route in BOTH directions. This is the end-to-end proof that everything before it worked. Verify with: ping 10.69.3.10
Tips
Work in the order given: later goals depend on the earlier ones. After every change, run the verify command before moving on; do not guess. Stuck? Read the verify output first. It names the interface, neighbour or route that is wrong. Common mistake: A subnet mask instead of a wildcard mask in a network statement Common mistake: Different area numbers on the two ends of a link Common mistake: Leaving the LAN port active so hellos leak to hosts
Why this matters
OSPF routers exchange link-state advertisements and each builds the same map of the area, so a new LAN is found everywhere without touching the other routers. Neighbours form only when area, subnet and timers agree.
What you will be able to do
Enable OSPF with a router-id and network statements
Read neighbour state and the learned routes
Find an area mismatch
The network
ISR 2911, PC — 6 devices in all, already cabled.
Fa0 Gi0/0 10.69.1.1/24 Fa0 Gi0/0 10.69.2.1/24 Fa0 Gi0/0 10.69.3.1/24 Gi0/1 172.17.49.1/30 Gi0/1 172.17.49.2/30 Gi0/2 172.17.49.5/30 Gi0/1 172.17.49.6/30 Gi0/2 172.17.49.9/30 Gi0/2 172.17.49.10/30 R-Jabalpur PC-Jabalpur 10.69.1.10/24 · gw 10.69.1.1 R-Jaipur PC-Jaipur 10.69.2.10/24 · gw 10.69.2.1 R-Guwahati PC-Guwahati 10.69.3.10/24 · gw 10.69.3.1 Drawn from this lab: devices, cables, ports and the addresses already set.
Device Model Address already set
R-Jabalpur ISR 2911 configure it
PC-Jabalpur PC 10.69.1.10 / 255.255.255.0 gw 10.69.1.1
R-Jaipur ISR 2911 configure it
PC-Jaipur PC 10.69.2.10 / 255.255.255.0 gw 10.69.2.1
R-Guwahati ISR 2911 configure it
PC-Guwahati PC 10.69.3.10 / 255.255.255.0 gw 10.69.3.1
Cabling
PC-Jabalpur Fa0 ↔ R-Jabalpur Gi0/0
PC-Jaipur Fa0 ↔ R-Jaipur Gi0/0
PC-Guwahati Fa0 ↔ R-Guwahati Gi0/0
R-Jabalpur Gi0/1 ↔ R-Jaipur Gi0/1
R-Jaipur Gi0/2 ↔ R-Guwahati Gi0/1
R-Guwahati Gi0/2 ↔ R-Jabalpur Gi0/2
What is configured at the start
These are already configured when the lab opens — including, where this is a troubleshooting lab, the fault itself:
R-Jabalpur interface g0/0
ip address 10.69.1.1 255.255.255.0
no shutdown
exit
interface g0/1
ip address 172.17.49.1 255.255.255.252
no shutdown
exit
interface g0/2
ip address 172.17.49.10 255.255.255.252
no shutdown
exit
router ospf 58
router-id 1.1.1.1
network 10.69.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 172.17.49.0 0.0.0.3 area 0
network 172.17.49.8 0.0.0.3 area 0
passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
exit
R-Jaipur interface g0/0
ip address 10.69.2.1 255.255.255.0
no shutdown
exit
interface g0/1
ip address 172.17.49.2 255.255.255.252
no shutdown
exit
interface g0/2
ip address 172.17.49.5 255.255.255.252
no shutdown
exit
router ospf 58
router-id 2.2.2.2
network 10.69.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 172.17.49.0 0.0.0.3 area 0
network 172.17.49.4 0.0.0.3 area 0
passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
exit
R-Guwahati interface g0/0
ip address 10.69.3.1 255.255.255.0
no shutdown
exit
interface g0/1
ip address 172.17.49.6 255.255.255.252
no shutdown
exit
interface g0/2
ip address 172.17.49.9 255.255.255.252
no shutdown
exit
router ospf 58
router-id 3.3.3.3
network 10.69.3.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 172.17.49.4 0.0.0.3 area 1
network 172.17.49.8 0.0.0.3 area 0
passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
exit
Tasks, and how each one is checked
Every task is decided by reading the live network — a neighbour in FULL, a ping that succeeds, a line in the running configuration — not by looking for a keyword you typed. The same command shows you what the lab sees.
# Task Pts How to verify it yourself
1 R-Jabalpur has 2 OSPF neighbours in FULL 8 On R-Jabalpur: show ip ospf neighbor shows at least 2 neighbour(s) in FULL.
2 R-Jaipur has 2 OSPF neighbours in FULL 8 On R-Jaipur: show ip ospf neighbor shows at least 2 neighbour(s) in FULL.
3 R-Guwahati has 2 OSPF neighbours in FULL 8 On R-Guwahati: show ip ospf neighbor shows at least 2 neighbour(s) in FULL.
4 R-Jabalpur learns 10.69.3.0/24 from the protocol 10 On R-Jabalpur: show ip route lists 10.69.3.0/24.
5 10.69.1.10 (Jabalpur) reaches 10.69.3.10 (Guwahati) 12 On PC-Jabalpur: ping 10.69.3.10 must succeed.
6 10.69.2.10 (Jaipur) reaches 10.69.1.10 (Jabalpur) 12 On PC-Jaipur: ping 10.69.1.10 must succeed.
7 Every LAN reaches every other LAN 12 On PC-Jabalpur: ping 10.69.2.10 must succeed. and On PC-Jabalpur: ping 10.69.3.10 must succeed. and On PC-Jaipur: ping 10.69.1.10 must succeed. and On PC-Jaipur: ping 10.69.3.10 must succeed. and On PC-Guwahati: ping 10.69.1.10 must succeed. and On PC-Guwahati: ping 10.69.2.10 must succeed.
Stuck? Ask the coach
Tell the coach what you see or what you tried. It gives you a hint, not the answer, the way a senior engineer would. Included with a free trial or any plan.
Ask the coach
Common mistakes
A subnet mask instead of a wildcard mask in a network statement
Different area numbers on the two ends of a link
Leaving the LAN port active so hellos leak to hosts
Reference solution
Try it yourself first — the lab checks your work either way. This is one configuration that makes every task pass, device by device:
R-Guwahati router ospf 58
no network 172.17.49.4 0.0.0.3 area 1
network 172.17.49.4 0.0.0.3 area 0
exit
Where this is examined
CCNA 3.0 OSPFv2; CCNP ENARSI OSPF.
This lab practises these topics in the zNetLaB certification courses:
Related labs
Where to start
The lessons are open to everyone, all guided labs are listed by track, and
plans explains what is free and what is not.
CCNA®, CCNP® and Cisco® are trademarks of Cisco Systems, Inc. zNetLaB is not affiliated with or endorsed by Cisco.